Share the post "Mapping UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage"
The creation of a list of intangible cultural elements to preserve (ICH, UNESCO) should be understood as a kind of reaction to the vast World Heritage List (WHC, UNESCO), highly politicized “wonders of the world” directory. For many reasons, related to the preservation of ancient monuments, the Western-centric definition of the terms “cultural” or “heritage” or because we find many European countries actively involved in United Nations programs, Europe is over-represented in the World Heritage list.
Comparing the “World heritage” and the “Intangible cultural heritage” distribution
WORLD HERITAGE SITES – Europe and North America host 48% of the listed items, while these territories account for only 16% of the world population, a rate of 40 items listed for 100M inhabitants. By comparison, the rate is 5/100M in Asia, 10/100M in Africa, 20/100M in the Arab States and 21/100M in Latin America.
INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE – Implicitly, the intangible cultural heritage directory aims to restore a form of balance, including a new element to list. As a result of a political choice to favor the marginalized elements, the number of intangible heritage elements in North America and Europe are less numerous (but still 33% of the new list). Asia, meanwhile, is better highlighted.
Mapping the intangible cultural heritage
Music occupies a prominent place in the ICH list: of the 313 items recorded until 2014, there are 109 musical elements to which are added 74 elements including music.
Source: UNESCO.ORG (data until 2014)
Update (2019)
This map has been updated with data until 2018 for the needs of a French musicology journal issue about intangible heritage. Find the introduction here (english version) and the new map below. Things have changed a lot in recent years, especially in Eastern Europe and Western Asia.
Share the post "Mapping UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage"
Pingback : @BiblioLingue
Pingback : @LearningRaph
Pingback : @Camaelis
Pingback : @Fawkes_Family
Pingback : @fabricea
Pingback : @ybenju
Pingback : @willoxh
Pingback : @nsb_unil
Pingback : @Irl_HeritageDig
Pingback : @zedyork
Pingback : @shonilbhagwat
Pingback : @AnStofferis
Pingback : @MuseumsAtMQ
Pingback : @danspock
Pingback : @frili27
Pingback : @MasterGeografia
Pingback : @roblancefield
Pingback : @adralvsan
Pingback : @tutaleni
Pingback : @CaribbeanMemory
Pingback : @Asteria_srl
Pingback : @nbelhoste
Pingback : @Unpajaromeconto
Pingback : @yoselin_rp
Pingback : @NEMETICS
Pingback : Arthur Charpentier (@freakonometrics)
Martin, what is the name of this projection system?
Hi, thanks for the comment! It's a Bertin 1953.
Lovely, reminds me of the old FAO maps
Pingback : @amrbss
Pingback : @ShoahLegacy
This really amazing. is it a mix of big data, and open data that has lead to this?
Let's say that this data is openly available on UNESCO website (even if I'm unsure about calling it "open data" because this is a very curated list).
Pingback : @xabiergf
This is really inspiring work. What did you use to put the circular bound around the bubbles within a country?
Thank you for your message. In fact, this map is hand-drawn, that means that the circular bound is a simple vector object in Inkscape.
Pingback : A világ megfoghatatlan csodái | Papageno